adobe indesign database Buy Adobe Illustrator CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe creative suite 3 contents adobe photoshop cs upgrade windows Buy Adobe Illustrator CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign cs2 warez adobe indesign free downloads Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection OEM - Online Software Downloads Center open sourc corel draw adobe illustrator adobe photoshop free online tutorial Buy Adobe Flash Professional CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center fonts for adobe photoshop cs adobe creative suite 2 Buy Adobe Flash Professional CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center purchase adobe photoshop cs2 transparent colour gif in adobe photoshop Buy Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign cs palettes adobe photoshop and not elements cs Buy Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center oem adobe photoshop cs2 download adobe photoshop 7.01 Buy Adobe InDesign CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign xml adobe photoshop 6 upgrade Buy Adobe InDesign CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe cs3 keygenerator dreamweaver adobe illustrator tutorials post cards Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe photoshop black and white images adobe creative free photo suite Buy Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe illustrator course outline adobe photoshop elements 5.0 photo editing Buy Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe cs3 photoshop oem

Posts Tagged ‘trade’

Why fair trade?

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

By Nicole Mesman

It’s Saturday night and I am sitting in the back of our family’s ute as we make our way home from a friend’s house. I lean against the window staring out, when suddenly our old front stereo roars into life. It’s Dad; he has turned on the radio for what he thinks is the 7 o-clock news. He’s a little early however, they are just on a pre-news interview.

car-radioHi’, she says my name is Molly Crower and you’re listening to a pre-news muse, from the home of radio truth. Tonight we will be interviewing Hayden Spencer, Trade Aid’s spokesperson in New Zealand regarding the upcoming Fair Trade Fortnight. Good evening Hayden.

Hello Molly.’

So Hayden I hear that Fair Trade Fortnight is coming up from the 3rd to the 18th of May?’

It certainly is.’

Perhaps you could give us a bit of background? For starters what is fair trade

My ears prick up. This interview sounds interesting! I tell Dad to turn it up.

Nepal potsWell’ continues Hayden, fair trade is when companies buy goods such as cotton, tea, cocoa and coffee beans, and also craft items such as clothing, baskets, jewellery etc, from producers in places such as Africa, Asia and South America for a fair and consistent price. It also works to protect workers rights by preventing the use of harmful sprays around crops, increasing safe working conditions, and decreasing the numbers of child workers.’

And is it true that through fair trade’ the buyer is also contributing U.S 5cents per pound of coffee to the grower’s community for them to invest at will?

That’s right Molly’.

So now what can you tell us about Fair Trade Fortnight Hayden?

Well, it’s about raising people’s awareness, this year the fortnight focuses on environmental justice which is about us realising that the developing world, who contribute the LEAST to climate change will be the ones who feel it the MOST.’

Really?!’

CinnamonYes, I’m afraid so. The majority of the world live in developing countries yet it is the small percentage of the world’s population that live in developed countries (like us!) that have contributed most to this global problem. What people need to be think about Molly is how unfair is it that developing countries who are already losing out by unfair trade rules, will be expected to foot more than their fair share of the climate change bill. Realising this encourages us to think about how we can reduce our carbon footprint and reminds us how important it is to support fair trade. Throughout the Fortnight there will be loads of activities, competitions and events will be run all over the country. There’s more information at www.tradeaid.co.nz or www.fairtrade.org.nz.

That was great Hayden.

No problem Molly.

The interview finished and was replaced by the news, but I heard none of it. There were so many questions buzzing around in my head. How did fair trade start? Was Hayden just presenting one side of the story? Was fair trade really as good as they made it out to be?

tibetan-carpetsMy determination to find out drove me to the internet very early the next morning, where I found a range of information to answer my questions. I discovered that it all started in the late 1940’s after World War II, with some U.S churches selling handicrafts made by refugees in Europe. The idea of fair trade first came to Aotearoa New Zealand when Richard and Vi Cottrell, who had been helping out with the Tibetan refuge resettlement in India in 1969, came back to New Zealand to raise funds for the refugees. They started by selling a $1000 worth of Tibetan carpets in Christchurch and later moved on to develop Trade Aid stores across the country. At Trade Aid all products are made organically, produced on a small scale and shipped to conserve fuel.

I also found out that although most people would agree that fair trade is a good thing, it does have it critics. My research uncovered some individuals who thought supermarkets and companies where abusing the fair trade concept to make greater financial gains on products. One independent survey revealed that products where between 9-16 percent more expensive than others. One site didn’t think fair trade went far enough. It questioned the structures on which fair trade was built, saying that if they did not change significantly, the rich would continue to get richer and the poor remain poor.

After reading all this, my opinion is that fair trade is overall positive thing. Yes, supermarkets and some companies can profit from the products, but you can avoid this by buying from ethical stores such as Trade Aid. It may not be perfect, but anything that improves the working conditions and livelihoods of farmers and their families has got to be a good thing. Right!?

shopping-bags-smlTAKE ACTION - How can YOU support fair trade?


LEARN MORE

Learn more about environmental justice at www.tradeaid.co.nz
Check out the great cartoons at www.maketradefair.com which explain how unfair the current trade system is.

A version of this article was published in the May 2008 issues of actv8.


Drug Money - the real cost

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

By Ian Blythe

opium-poppiesWhile taking drugs isn’t new, the incredible growth in the illegal drug trade is! Despite all the risks involved, it has grown into a multi-billion dollar industry, and news seems to be spreading of the mula that can be made. It comes down to simple economics: the greater demand the higher the price. Drugs are in great demand and prices are high. But what is the real cost?

It begins with poverty
All drugs have been on a journey. That journey starts with a need and ends with a want. The crop growers or farmers at the start of the production chain are generally poor and desperate for income. They need money to feed their families and pay their bills, just like everybody else. Illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin and cannabis are more profitable than legal crops such as wheat. A plot of land planted in wheat will earn a farmer $100 while the same plot planted in opium poppies could be worth $4000! Where poverty is found so are plantations for an array of drugs. For example:

  • Coca leaf, which is turned into cocaine, is cultivated in Peru and Bolivia, countries where, according to the World Bank over half the population live below the poverty line.
  • 92% of the world’s heroin derives from poppy plantations in Afghanistan, which was ranked 173rd of 178 countries in the UN’s 2004 Human Development Index.
  • 70% of the cannabis used in Europe comes from Morocco, where 14% of the population live on less than $2 a day.

Unfortunately the cultivation of drugs doesn’t stop the stop the cycle of poverty. While providing a source of income, it can be dangerous work and farmers find that because they are working in an illegal occupation they have no power and can’t fight for fair pay or better working conditions. They can easily be exploited by traffickers and gangs.

Bad for people, bad for the earth
clearedlandDrug cultivation can have a disastrous effect on individuals and communities, but it also has huge ecological implications. To grow poppies or coca leaves means that farmers need to have fertile soil, warm conditions and a private open field. So they end up cutting down or burning trees to make room. Not just a few trees though, millions of hectares of tropical forest have been cleared, just to keep up with the demand. The use of large quantities of pesticides, weed killers and fertilisers to maximise production leads to a loss in biodiversity, polluted soil and contaminated waterways. The topsoil is often left infertile by the end of the season and it can take up to three seasons to return to its original fertility. So the farmers continue to clear new areas of forest.

Who IS benefiting then?
The profit margins for the traffickers and drug dealers are HUGE. With the farmers only receiving 1% of the street value of many drugs, there is a lot of money to be made along the way. Cocaine bought in Columbia worth $1500 per kilogram could be sold on the streets of America for as much as $66,000 a kilogram. This part of the drugs journey is usually controlled by gangs or criminal cartels. Drug trafficking, estimated to account for 8% of the all global trade, has given organised crime immense power and wealth, but with this much money at stake, competition is fierce and often ends in violence.

Customer relations
The drug’s journey ends with want. With 180 million regular drug users around the world this want creates significant demand. Drug addiction is complex, but at it’s core it about a user’s physical and emotional dependence on their drug of choice. Addiction creates a secure market for suppliers and keeps the prices high. Lucrative returns and future prospects of an even higher income keep people involved in the industry

Big pond, little fish
buying-drugsEverybody involved in the chain of production and distribution is accountable for the vast effects of this industry. Society is very fast paced and everybody is looking for instant gratification - kiwis are no different. We are not a major drug producer, but Aotearoa New Zealand is home to an increasing number of users. In the last couple of years there has been a steep increase in usage of Methamphetamine, more commonly known as “P”. As “P” is problematically addictive the spread was inevitable. But P isn’t the only drug we’re using. Cannabis is the most readily accessible drug, as it is not only cheap as chips, but very easy to cultivate. Per capita Oceania (an area that includes us, Pacific Island Nations and Australia,) has the highest level of cannabis users in the world.

Five Facts about the Global Drug Trade

  1. 92% of the world’s heroin derives from poppy plantations in Afghanistan
  2. The income of those involved in growing drug crops is 1% of their drugs street value
  3. Millions of hectares of tropical forest in South America have been destroyed in the cultivation of coca (used to make cocaine)
  4. 180 million people worldwide use illegal drugs regularly
  5. Drug trafficking is estimated to account for 8% of all global trade

TAKE ACTION!
The circumstances may seem overwhelming, but there is a lot you can do to help!

  • First you need to get motivated, so get informed and dig a little bit deeper. Check out the Learn More section.
  • After you feel motivated you need to get empowered - get involved with some of the local organisations working in this area. The New Zealand Drug Foundation not only produces lots of resources, but they run events too. Community Action on Youth and Drugs project (CAYAD) run projects all around the country, call your local council to see what’s going on near you.
  • Next you have got to live it, talk about the REAL COST of drugs with your friends and stand firm for what you believe in.

LEARN MORE

Global Bits - The Trafficking trap
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime -The World Drug Report
New Zealand Drug Foundation

This article was originally published in Jet Magazine.

Opportunity, exploitation and resistance

Friday, September 7th, 2007

The Life of a Migrant Worker

By Cameron Walker

Who/What is a migrant worker?
The United Nations defines a migrant worker as a person who is to be engaged, is engaged or has been engaged in a remunerated activity in a State of which he or she is not a national’. In simple terms a migrant worker is someone who works in a country in which they’re not a citizen.

Migrant WorkersAn International Labour Organisation (ILO) report stated that many migrant workers “are not looking simply for better work. Propelled by poverty and insecurity, they are looking for any work.” Some travel great distances to find opportunities to earn enough money to make them and their families better off. However, while some find opportunity in their host countries many others find that they’re treated terribly by their bosses, paid low wages, are victims of racism and harassment by the police and immigration authorities, and are treated as invisible by their host country’s people.

Latin American migrant workers tend to move to the US to find work, Africans journey to Europe. Workers from the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand tend to leave for richer parts of Asia, such as Hong Kong and Japan, while from those from the nations of the Pacific, such as Tuvalu, Tonga and Samoa come to Aotearoa New Zealand or Australia.

Money WorldMigrant workers have become extremely important to their home and host countries. According to the Financial Times migrant workers in the United States (US) last year sent home US$62.3 billion to their families in Latin America and the Caribbean, while in their host country, the US, they do unpopular jobs at a price few locals would work for. Worldwide, money sent home by migrant workers is worth about US$232 billion!

Tatik’s Story
I work as a domestic here in Hong Kong to support my family in Indonesia. I am the eighth of nine children and my family depends on me for food, clothing, education — everything. Many of the migrants who come here are from villages where they cannot find work. But even those who have finished university come here because there is no work. We cannot survive and improve our lives at home. That’s why we are here, we do not want to be here.
Some of us are treated well by our employers, many are not. The main problems are low pay and unfair dismissal. But there is physical abuse too. And the working hours can be very long. You go to bed at 1 or 2am and your employer expects you to be up at 6am.
Tatik, President of the Coalition of Migrant Workers in Hong Kong

Source New Internationalist, April 2006, NI388

Why do Migrant Workers leave their home countries to work?

Many Mexican migrant workers have made perilous illegal journeys through the desert — risking thirst, exposure to the elements and harassment and intimidation by border guards and vigilante groups, known as the Minutemen’, across the US border.

Economic conditions in Mexico have been particularly bad for the poor since the country entered into the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the US and Canada in 1994. The agreement forced Mexico to drop all its restrictions on food imports from the US, while in the US agribusiness corporations were (and still are!) highly subsidised by the government and able to dump their produce at a very cheap price in Mexico — so cheap that Mexican farmers could not compete. Many Mexican farmers were forced off their land so they flooded to the cities to find work. The oversupply of workers in the cities drove down wages to a level where many could not afford the basics. This in turn made it so many had to go across the border, either legally or illegally to find work.

USMexico BorderRather than addressing the economic conditions creating large numbers of illegal migrants, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has launched Operation Return to Sender’, a huge campaign to round up, detain and deport migrant workers from Latin America. Laura Carlsen, an analyst for the International Relations Center, writes that the US state treats migrants as if they’re human junk mail’.

Even in Aotearoa New Zealand migrant workers may not be fairly treated. The Press recently reported about the awful working conditions of Thai labourers employed on Marlborough’s vineyards.

A married Thai couple, Surachet Kannika and Orasa Khambut, both 25, paid $10,000 each to a Thai recruitment agency for an offer of work in New Zealand, flights and expenses. They borrowed the money — enough to buy a good house in Thailand — having been told they could earn $5000 a month between them in New Zealand. However, when they began pruning for Havenleigh a horticultural contracting company, in Seddon last year, they were taking home about $200 a week each, after tax and rent of $96 each was deducted. They were forced to work 60 to 70-hour, seven-day weeks and public holidays, without proper recompense, were bullied by supervisors, and ordered to work in other regions without negotiation. The Labour Department is currently investigating the complaint.

Source: The Press | Saturday, 2 June 2007.

TomatoThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers CIW is a community-based workers organisation. Members are largely Latino, Haitian, and Mayan Indian immigrants working in low-wage jobs throughout Florida. They fight for, among other things, fair wages, more respect, better and cheaper housing, stronger laws and the right to be part of a union. In 2005 in the US, fast food chain, Taco Bell was forced to increase the pay of migrant tomato pickers working for the restaurant’s suppliers, after a four year long boycott campaign by the Coalition of Immokalee Workers. The campaign was supported by university and high school students all over the country who set up blockades of Taco Bells on their campuses. Taco Bell’s parent company, Yum Brands, has recently announced that this pay agreement will be extended to ALL its fast food chains!

Burger KingMore Info

Take Action

  • Become informed. (see the resources above)
  • Challenge racism and bigotry against migrants. If you hear someone going on about how poor immigrants cause New Zealand’s social problems or how migrant workers “are taking our jobs” challenge them.
  • Join or volunteer with a union. Solidarity Union is a small union that has been organising Auckland workers in non-unionised factories, including many migrant workers.
  • Celebrate International Migrants Day on December 18

A version of this article was originally published in JET magazine.

DRUGS: Nobody’s is winning the war

Tuesday, October 10th, 2006

Phoebe Borwick and Amy Donohue

opium poppiesThe trade behind cocaine (or coca, as the plant of origin is known) and heroin (which comes from opium poppies) is a global issue. An estimated four million people depend on income derived from the cultivation of illicit drug crops. In the year 2000, the global drug trade was estimated at a value of US$400 billion. It’s an issue worth more than the price of feeding the planet over the same period of time.

From the rainforests of South America to the remotest parts of Afghanistan to Pete Doherty’s honker, we trace the journey of the most profitable crops in the world.

From the dark ages…
Way back when we were still running around with leaves covering our lower regions, South Americans chewed the leaf of the coca plant. Often incorrectly considered a narcotic, cocaine is actually a stimulant and when chewed suppresses hunger, while increasing strength and energy.

Cue the Spaniards arriving in South America and branding coca a plant that the devil invented for the total destruction of the natives’. Or, that’s what one prominent Catholic artist declared.
They changed their minds a bit when they discovered it really did stimulate quite nicely thus legalising it and charging a nifty little tax for their own economic benefit. For a time, coca was even the main source of income for the Roman Catholic Church. Sneaky, sneaky!

…to today…
Ironically, the two most fatal drugs are still legal today and taxed to the hilt by governments around the world. Alcohol and tobacco kill more people than illicit drugs every year and are both widely accepted and available.

The very fact that other drugs are illegal increases the profit to be made. With criminals running the show, the prices skyrocket.

…to leafy fields…
Cocaine is an economical crop for farmers not only because of its high selling cost and ever-present demand, but its quick maturation period. Within one to two years of planting the seed, the coca plant’s leaves will be ready to harvest with a drying period of only six hours. And opium poppies have an even quicker yield.

…to environmental destruction…
More than 30 years ago, the US came up with the superhero tactic to rid the world, and especially their own country (where the demand was coming from), of the evil empire of narcotics. They called it the War on Drugs.
george bush
The most widespread method of destroying the coca plant in the 90s, and the opium poppy still today, was to manually pull up every single plant in a field. Time consuming and tiring, there must have been an easier way?

Consequently, air eradication with herbicides became rather popular. In as little as ten days after spraying, the plants are stripped bare of their leaves and within around 70 days, the plant will be completely dead. RIP, indeed. US-sponsored Plan Colombia was, to effect, an aerial fumigation of this country — the second most ecologically diverse in the world. Spraying caused poisoning and environmental damage.

Herbicides have been linked to diarrhoea, hair loss and skin rashes on children. Also, legal crops like bananas, coffee and pineapples are often destroyed along with the coca plant. Yes, we have no bananas. Not quite the lycra and rippling muscles the US had envisaged. In Afghanistan, post the US-led invasion, local and international troops are enlisted in eradicating poppy crops — as are schoolchildren in some provinces. This is dangerous work.

Imagine you’re a farmer who’s invested cash and time in a poppy field. How would you feel if you saw it being literally stamped out? Might make you want to protect your only chance of making a living. Where’s that gun that’s been lying around since the war? Further problems arise as more coca plants and poppies are eradicated. Demand for the drug remains constant (or grows) while there are fewer crops, resulting in the existing crops becoming more lucrative. More farmers then begin to grow the plant to take advantage of the price increase. What a conundrum!

…to poverty…
With secrecy comes vulnerability and international drug rings are not covered by fair trade agreements. Globalisation of the drug trade has led to even greater exploitation of the crop farmers along with cheaper and easier international trafficking. The globalisation of the drug trade forms a connection between organised crime, small arms, terrorism, human trafficking and all kinds of criminal and seedy life.

In 1999, nearly 80 per cent of opium cultivation took place in Afghanistan. Chances are, a gram of coke purchased in the US, Europe or New Zealand comes from a coca bush grown in the Andean countries. In fact, Bolivia, Colombia and Peru account for more than 98 per cent of the world supply. Already in poverty, working with poor soil and unempowered to change their circumstances — not to mention the influence of drug lords and anti-government groups — farmers often have no choice if they want to keep food on the table.

Yet, the War on Drugs is not being won. The US’ efforts to strip Latin America and Afghanistan of their coca and poppy crops are also stripping the livelihood of millions. While thrill-seekers in the west demand the drugs, and their governments react by trying to stop the supply, farmers will continue to grow the illicit crops unless they are offered a real alternative way to make a living.

….to terrorism…

gun
Yes, that’s right. Terrorism. Stop or they’ll shoot (up). The links between terrorism, drugs and war are extensive and very real. In 2001, just weeks before two planes barrelled into the Twin Towers, the US pledged a further $1.5m to plump out the reported $140m in ‘humanitarian’ aid it sent to Afghanistan. Why?

Because western methods of enforcing drug cultivation laws proved ineffective, but groups with violent means available to them could whip out grenades and guns willy nilly, without a thought for morality. The Taliban was limiting drug production by threatening to shoot farmers of illicit crops. Thus, they were held in high American esteem until everything went to custard on September 11.

But the corruption ran deeper. After the attacks, the Taliban turned tail to force farmers to grow the poppies. They, and other anti-government organisations, act as trafficking middlemen and a defence force, making profit out of the trade and protecting drug smugglers with weaponry and vehicles.

Still wanna get high, butterfly?
So, you still down with shovelling that candy up your nose this Friday? Are you quite content to continue your involvement with one of the world’s deadliest industries? You don’t need to rent Traffic, Requiem for a Dream or Maria Full of Grace to understand the true repercussions of your habit on the developing countries of the world. And if you still don’t get it, then you must be wasted. Go blow your nose and have an OJ.

LEARN MORE

Afghanistan country profile
Colombia country profile
Drugs: an overview
Drug Policy Alliance is America’s leading organisation working to end the war on drugs.
The worldwide collective of committed scholar-activists at Transnational Institute
Illegal Drugs: Scourge or Globalization’s Great Equalizer? by Baylen J. Linnekin

This article was originally published in Tearaway magazine as part of the Global Focus project.

Selling out our neighbours and serving the empire

Monday, February 27th, 2006

Omar Hamed

There was something quite insidious in the way Winston Peters’ worded his comments about the direction of New Zealand foreign policy for the next five years. His speech on Tuesday seemed to hint at unspeakable things and those who listened to it must have left the room feeling as though only half the puzzle pieces had been given to them. The rhetoric that Peters delivered veiled the truth behind our government’s foreign policy, a policy that is set to cast a heavy shadow across the Pacific.

One of the trends Peters identified, as part of our foreign policy, is globalisation which he said, “Has had a demonstrable effect on our economy, our standard of living and the make up of our society.” Yes, we have become a much more diverse and multi-cultural nation and the better for it. On the other hand the demonstrable effect on our standard of living and the state of the economy is not something the Minister of Foreign Affairs should be particularly proud of.

Globalisation should be understood in the framework that it depresses the most vulnerable sectors of our society while strengthening trans-national corporations that externalise their social and environmental costs onto the communities they plunder. As the age of the corporation ascended from1980-2001, real wages dropped in New Zealand by 6.5%, yet in the same two decades corporate profits went from 34% of GDP to 46%. Wages as a share of GDP fell from 57% to 42%. However, the low paid workers of Aotearoa, overwhelmingly migrants, women and young people, from the care-givers in rest homes to the staff at the multinational fast food franchises have not seen the last of what Peters calls the, “well-documented downside to globalisation.” With the government refusing to raise the minimum wage to a living wage of twelve dollars an hour it condemns those who make up the working poor to subsistence, not knowing whether or not they can make ends meet and put food for their children on the table.

The twenty-first century will surely be the century of globalisation for the Pacific island countries and their “deeply concerning poverty” needs to be addressed. Peters, puts his faith in the New Zealand government instituted Pacific Plan’ to take care of “economic growth and social development”. The plan although widely promoted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade as a blueprint for development was condemned in late 2005 by a network of South Pacific NGOs “as a flawed document that ignores the real needs of island peoples…There has been a glaring lack of attention given to critical areas such as water and sanitation, literacy and access to employment and other income generating opportunities.” golden globe

In a statement Orwell himself would be proud of Peters labelled the plan part of a move towards “regional cooperation in the Pacific.” It would be much fairer to label our role as regional extortion; Oxfam New Zealand described the plan as, “locking Pacific island nations into unfair, inappropriate and damaging trade deals.” On top of this the Pacific region has been at the receiving end of our governments efforts to liberalise their trade through a raft of free trade agreements and to the particularly damaging accession of a number of islands to the World Trade Organisation including Tonga which joined on what Oxfam called, “the worst terms ever offered to any country.” Jane Kelsey reported in 2004 the comments of one New Zealand consultant at the trade negotiations for one of these agreements, “The whole experience was stressful and demoralizing for me, let alone for the Pacific Islands negotiators. There were times that I felt ashamed to be a New Zealander”.

All this leads one to wonder, is this part of the, “progress being made in addressing the challenges facing Pacific island countries”? Or is it time New Zealand took a good hard look at our foreign policy and fronted up to the fact that we are part of the problem in the Pacific?

There has been little research done into the social costs of the trade agreements like the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) that form cornerstones of our foreign policy in the Pacific, but what has been done supports the conclusion that it will do more harm than good in an area that is one of only two regions (the other is sub-Saharan Africa) that lack furthest behind in their achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. As a result of our policy of trade liberalisation Fiji’s vulnerable garment sector faces “potentially huge social costs and political consequences of large scale unemployment among the predominantly Indo-Fijian women workers at a time when men are losing jobs on sugar plantations and their families squat in urban slums.”

Possibly the best paragraph in Peters speech was when he said, “It is in our interests, and theirs, to see that our Pacific neighbours are well educated, healthy, able to earn a living, and can embrace the values underpinning a well-governed democratic society.”

Why though do we act so often as if the above was of no concern to us?

NZ Sweatshops Inc.

Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

Cameron Walker

So your brand new, highly expensive, major brand jacket actually cost less than two bucks to make in a Thai sweatshop. How cool is that?! Not very. Leading sportswear companies continue to make huge profits from unethical sweatshop labour.

Earlier this year Sripai Nonsee, a trade unionist and former sweatshop worker from Thailand, visited New Zealand to speak about the terrible conditions facing clothing workers in Thailand. At the age of 17 Sripai left her rural home to find work in the Thai capital, Bangkok. She got a job at a firm called Par Garment, producing clothing for big brand sportswear companies, such as Nike, Adidas, GAP, Old Navy and Fila. These clothing brands are very expensive in shops in more developed countries such as New Zealand, but the workers who produce them are treated very badly. The sportswear companies use sweatshop labour because it brings down the amount of money they have to spend on production, which means they make more profit.

Vulnerable to abuse
Conditions in the factory where Sripai worked were very poor. The workers, mainly teenage girls and young women, were forced to work three hours unpaid overtime. During this time they were locked in the factory and not allowed out. The factory was hot and dusty and had no first aid room. Sexual abuse was frequent and any worker who refused to submit to the sexual demands of the personnel officer would be threatened with the loss of their job. Many of those employed in sweatshops are vulnerable to abuse because they are young, desperate for work and from rural parts of Thailand, away from their families.

Working to improve conditions
The workers became sick of their treatment so they set up a trade union. At the age of 20 Sripai became the head of the union at her factory. Six years later she was fired when she tried to help workers set up a union at another Par Garment factory. In New Zealand forming a union is considered a basic right for workers. Thailand has not approved the International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions on the rights of workers to organize unions. This makes it easier for factory owners to get away with poor work conditions. Today Sripai works with organizations which aim to improve conditions for Thai clothing workers.

78 cents!
During her time in New Zealand, Sripai visited a sports store in Christchurch. She found a selection of jackets that she used to make in Thailand. Each of the jackets took less than two hours to make, for which the worker was paid 78 cents an hour. But in New Zealand they were being sold for $159.99 each. Sripai calculated it would take 205 hours, or eight and a half days and nights, for workers in her factory to earn enough money to buy just ONE of the jackets.

Ripped off
Last year the company which owns that particular store made a profit of $23.6 million. Some sportswear companies, such as Nike, make profits in the billions. These companies are growing very rich off the sweat of workers, like Sripai, in Thailand. Is it really worth spending huge amounts of money on clothing which is made by virtual slaves? We’re getting ripped off and so are Thai workers!

GLOSSARY

  • Sweatshop: A factory where workers are forced to work long hours, for low pay and with poor conditions. The factory Sripai worked in was a sweatshop.
  • Trade Union: An organized association of workers which aims to protect and improve pay and workplace conditions. Sripai is a clothing workers trade unionist.
  • International Labour Organisation (ILO): An agency of the United Nations which aims to promote fair conditions in the workplace and the abolition of forced labour. The ILO researches and creates rules for governments to put in place to ensure workplaces always have fair pay and conditions.

LEARN MORE

Sweatshops:

sweatshopwatch.org
Corpwatch.org
Aworldconnected.org
Feminist.org

    Fair trade in New Zealand and Australia:

    Trade Aid
    Fair Trade Association
    Scoop Article

      This article was originally written for the Global Focus project (link to explanation?), a collaborative effort between Tearaway Magazine and the Global Education Centre. It has been reproduced here with the permission of the good folk at Tearaway. This article appeared in the December 2004 issue of Tearaway.