Jayran Mansouri
I am going to talk to you about a prejudice many of us are unaware exists, in fact some of you may actually support it. If I am to be bluntly honest, most, if not all of you probably do. This prejudice is widely accepted by society, but never really discussed. You may consider yourself an open-minded and unjudgemental person and still discriminate against this group. Or you may not even consider it a prejudice. But it can be dangerous, especially for young people.
You’re probably all dying to know what it is now, aren’t you?
It’s prejudice against people who are considered of less-than-average intelligence. Think about it. How many times have you heard that phrase: “it’s not cool to be dumb”? That phrase to me is only as acceptable as saying “it’s not cool to be black/white/Asian/male/female/fat/ Muslim/Christian/Jewish/smart”
But what do we mean by dumb anyway? There are actually many different forms of intelligence.
So why is this prejudice so prevalent?
It’s because our society values particular types of intelligence over others.
Intelligence is a complex mixture of genetics and upbringing. We do not yet have a reliable way to measure it, and there is a chance we never will. Those infamous IQ tests do not come close to “measuring” one’s intelligence. How much brainpower constitutes one IQ point anyway.
A man by the name of Dr. Howard Gardner, a professor of education at Harvard University, believes that “multiple intelligences” exist. What does this mean? It means everyone’s brain has a unique way of functioning, which can roughly be divided into eight categories of intelligence. Most people relate to more than one.
- Linguistic (verbal intelligence) - good with words and enjoys reading and writing. Journalists are usually linguistically intelligent
- Spatial (visual intelligence) - artistic, creative and interprets artwork naturally
- Bodily (movement/kinesthetic intelligence) - athletic and/or physically co-ordinated
- Logical/mathematical (number intelligence) - good with numbers and solving problems, the extreme example of this is a “human calculator”
- Musical (musical intelligence) -someone with a good “ear”, who enjoys making, writing and/or listening to music
- Interpersonal (social intelligence)- understands and relates well with other people
- Intrapersonal (self intelligence)- someone with a strong understanding and analysis of their own personal thoughts, intuition and feelings
- Naturalist (nature intelligence)- is interested in life and nature, such as a botanist
Our culture puts more emphasis on mathematical and linguistic intelligence. You can see this all the time in schools, where our intelligence is tested mainly by exams and assignments based on mathematical and linguistic skills. People perceived to be “dumb” might turn out to have naturalist intelligence rather than traditionally accepted intelligence They might not know their times tables, but they can classify every plant in the garden. They might not feel comfortable in a class debate, but they can paint like Van Gogh or dance like JT!
Another reason why this prejudice is so widespread is because people considered to be “unintelligent” people are naturally under represented in decision-making fields like law and politics (with the possible exception of one President of the United States). We only see traditionally smart people making headlines, making a difference, being in charge, making the decisions. This leads us to believe that people who don’t display traditionally accepted intelligence are incapable of being leaders and are weak as members of society. We are taught to believe that traditionally intelligent people are more valuable to society,
and on a greater level, the human race. But look at the world today, so many people living in poverty and conflict, maybe it would be in a better state if it were run by gardeners, artists, musicians and dancers!?
G8 Leaders 2005
So the next time you hear anyone say “it’s not cool to be dumb” or “dumb isn’t cool”, go ahead and challenge their intelligence.
- LEARN MORE
- Check out Wikipedia for more info and links on Multiple Intelligences.
- For a perspective on intelligence and the differences found across cultures check out this article -It’s a bit academic, but interesting.

Naomi Wolf, author of The Beauty Myth, suggested a cultural backlash against feminism used images of “beauty” to keep women “in their place”. How many people have believed (or still do) the idea that women are feminists only because they’re too ugly or undesirable to get a man? That popular concept originally showed up on the scene to describe the feminists who appeared in the 19th century. These were women who were lobbying for the right to vote. Since then society has attempted to punish women who seek more control over their lives.
One suggested issue was the perception of women in the media. “There is still an expectation in the media and advertising that women must be physically and sexually attractive in order to be valued,” said one male.
When asked what feminism meant to her, one female I talked to imagined the feminists of the 70s— “burning bras, a shift in the status quo with regards to women and their place in the workforce, some of the most amazing art of the last few decades, and the original Suffragettes of the early 20th Century.” For her, feminism was about standing up for womanhood and all it entails without being over the top. “Embracing what sets us apart from men, but still having the right to do more ‘manly’ things.”
Many who support masculism (men’s rights) argue that because of both traditional gender roles and sexism infused into society by feminists, males are and have been oppressed. Men and Family rights groups oppose feminists such as Robin Morgan, the openly lesbian editor of Ms. Magazine, who advocated ‘man-hating’ as an honourable and viable political act and said the inequities between men and women cannot be resolved until marriage is destroyed. These groups are also critical of feminist encouragement of Lesbian agendas, undermining the traditional role of men in the family. Sheila Cronan controversially said to National NOW Times in 1988 that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist. [4]



Welcome to a world of music censorship, a subject that can get a lot of people very, very angry. Music is expression. Ideas, beliefs, and opinions are all set to a catchy tune.
Even more disturbing is the possible influences that white supremacist rock n’ roll (thankfully, a very small genre) may have — one distributor’s website featured an ad for a computer game called Ethnic Cleansing (violence for the whole family!). Hardly among the top 10 ways for making the world a better place.