adobe indesign database Buy Adobe Illustrator CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe creative suite 3 contents adobe photoshop cs upgrade windows Buy Adobe Illustrator CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign cs2 warez adobe indesign free downloads Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection OEM - Online Software Downloads Center open sourc corel draw adobe illustrator adobe photoshop free online tutorial Buy Adobe Flash Professional CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center fonts for adobe photoshop cs adobe creative suite 2 Buy Adobe Flash Professional CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center purchase adobe photoshop cs2 transparent colour gif in adobe photoshop Buy Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign cs palettes adobe photoshop and not elements cs Buy Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center oem adobe photoshop cs2 download adobe photoshop 7.01 Buy Adobe InDesign CS5 for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe indesign xml adobe photoshop 6 upgrade Buy Adobe InDesign CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe cs3 keygenerator dreamweaver adobe illustrator tutorials post cards Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for Mac OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe photoshop black and white images adobe creative free photo suite Buy Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe illustrator course outline adobe photoshop elements 5.0 photo editing Buy Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended OEM - Online Software Downloads Center adobe cs3 photoshop oem

Posts Tagged ‘banks’

In any way: Closing the door on munitions manufacturers

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

By Elliot Taylor

In May 2008, much of the world will join together in Dublin to formally negotiate a treaty to ban the use, development, production, trade, and stockpiling of cluster munitions The finer details — like who’s providing lunch and whether or not U2 will be at the mayoral reception — are still to be confirmed. What remains to be seen, however, is what effect this has, not only on manufacturers, but also on those that finance them.

dollar signYou could be forgiven for thinking that, walking into a Barclays Bank on the Rue Turenne in Paris, you’re the furthest away possible from the cluster munitions that rained down on Lebanon in 2006. It certainly doesn’t cross my mind when I stroll into a New Zealand National Bank - whose owner, ANZ, was part of an international syndicate providing weapons manufacturer Raytheon with a US$2.2 billion five-year revolving credit facility in 2005. Sure, it’s an easy mistake to make, but the fact is that all around the world, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, and other financial institutions are investing in the arms race. A race the Wellington Cluster Munitions Conference in February 2008 helped provide a much needed handbrake to.
Cluster Munition Conference
Admittedly, during a lunchtime talk on cluster bomb manufacturers and surrounding issues at the conference last month (Feb 08), Mark Hiznay helped shine the light on these issues. The senior researcher of the Human Rights Watch Arms Division pointed out to me his concern over a certain phrase that has seemed to have fallen off the page of Article 1 of the current treaty text: “In any way.”

“It’s been dropped,” Mark said, as he carefully wrote it in on my copy so that I didn’t forget. “This is in the Mine Ban Treaty and the Chemical Weapons Convention. This ‘in any way’, has been interpreted by legislatures to mean financial investment; direct or indirect financial investment. That’s been their hook into it.”

And it’s a hook that makes a world of sense. If a government, on humanitarian grounds, is willing to legislate against the use of cluster munitions, it’s only logical for them to also legislate against investment in any company that is involved in the manufacturing of such weapons. Any honourable government would not continue to allow local financial institutions to invest in industries that stand in stark contrast to its own policies.

Not surprisingly, Norway has again led the way on this issue with its Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund. Worth more than $300 billion, this is one of the largest pension funds in the world, so a little ethics is deemed appropriate. The role of the council is to “provide evaluation on whether or not investment in specified companies is inconsistent with the established ethical guidelines.” And from the presentation at the conference by Gro Nystuen, Chair of that Council, it sounds like it’s doing a pretty sterling job.

Belgium has also legislated against investment in companies producing cluster munitions, and according to Mark Hiznay, “the attitude of the Belgium banks shifted overnight. They realised that there’s going to be a new financial regulation that they have to comply with and they were falling over themselves to do it, because they didn’t want to be on the wrong side of their law.”

Similarly, Miriam Struyk of Pax Christi Netherlands has been making some noise on the issue in her home country. After a documentary highlighting the issue was aired on TV, the media latched on to the story, resulting in many pension funds withdrawing their unethical investments — even without government legislation.

These are promising developments. Sure, these may be examples of countries that have achieved certain levels of divestment without international legislation, but they are few and far between. There are also few positive examples yet here in New Zealand. Like Mark Hiznay, I hope the Oslo Process results in a treaty that will raise the call to never assist in any way those that manufacturer these deadly weapons. We need to close the door on assistance and throw away the key.


This article originally appeared in Cluster Ban News, Vol 1 Issue 3, 20 February 2008.

TAKE ACTION


LEARN MORE

Websites:
Oxfam campaigns against Cluster Bombs
Aotearoa New Zealand Stop Cluster Munition Coalition site
Wikipedia entry on Cluster bombs
Human Right Watch collection of documents on Cluster bombs
Heaps of info on http://www.stopclustermunitions.org/
Factsheet on cluster bombs on BBC news site

Videos:
Cluster Bombs: A Weapon out of Control - Human Rights Watch video on YouTube
A short film documenting the lethal effects of the use of cluster munitions worldwide, with commentary, new statistics and analysis from military experts at Human Rights Watch. The footage shows how cluster munitions have endangered civilian populations from the Vietnam era through current conflicts in Iraq and Lebanon.
Watch a video report on how thousands of unexploded cluster munitions still cover the battlefields and are wounding many unintended victims (civilians) in Lebanon.

What’s wrong with the G20’s neo-liberal agenda?

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

Omar Hamed

anti-capitalism signThe premier item on the G20’s agenda at it’s next meeting in Melbourne, in November 2006, is the reform of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Fifty Years is Enough Network describe them as two US-controlled institutions that for the last fifty years have been,

“imposing economic austerity policies in the countries of the so-called “Third World” or “global South.” Once Southern countries build up large external debts, as most have, they cannot get credit or cash anywhere else and are forced to go to these international institutions and accept whatever conditions are demanded of them. None of the countries has emerged from their debt problems; indeed most countries now have much higher levels of debt than when they first accepted IMF/World Bank “assistance.”(1)

The IMF and World Bank have been under pressure from a number of different corners in recent years, including the Argentinean uprising (between 2001 and 2002), mass mobilisations across the planet against neo-liberalism, and campaigns for the rich nations and these international finance institutions to drop the debt’ that many developing nations owe them.

The IMF is losing its grip over much of the developing world with Brazil, Argentina, Indonesia, Uruguay and Turkey seeking to pay back their loans as fast as possible, and high global commodity prices which have cut the IMF’s outstanding debt from over $70bn in 2003 to currently just over $20bn.(2) With the legitimacy of the Bretton Woods consensus under fire, and more and more nations refusing to take up its loans, the rich nations will be seeking a way to prolong the new world disorder they seek to build via the Washington consensus However, the iron grip of the IMF remains on many poor nations, such as Papua New Guinea, who are forced into “liberalising their economies and reducing social spending” by the IMF and World Bank. (3)
hand holding dollars
Barry Coates, the executive director of Oxfam New Zealand wrote that, “Because of its debts, Papua New Guinea has few resources to fund HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care… HIV infections are increasing by up to 50 percent per year and, if the epidemic follows the path of Zimbabwe, by 2020 the working age population in PNG will be 40 per cent smaller than it is today.”(4)

Oxfam and the Make Poverty History coalition think that if debt relief was offered to all 62 developing countries that need full debt cancellation to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) then progress will have been made. However, many of us who will hit the streets in Melbourne in December 2006 to protest against the G20 believe that the IMF and World Bank cannot be reformed, and that because of the stranglehold that the United States has over these institutions, the only way forward is to abolish both the World Bank and IMF, for developing nations to stop repaying their loans and for a new and fair institution to be set up to manage loans to nations.

As Global Exchange points out, “voting power at the World Bank and IMF is determined by the level of a nation’s financial contribution. Therefore, the United States has roughly 17% of the vote, with the seven largest industrialized countries (G-7) holding a total of 45%.” (5)


The WTO straightjacket’

The G20’s agenda of neo-liberalism and privatisation has been accurately described as “capitalism with the gloves off”. The G20 is pursuing neo-liberal economic reforms across the world, particularly in vulnerable developing nations such as those in the Pacific. Australia, aided by New Zealand, is working towards a free trade area in the south Pacific, while the European Union is seeking to impose free trade agreements with its former colonies and could, with its economic power, very easily crush Pacific economies through its Economic Partnership Agreements’. Add into this the predatory behaviour of many of the G20 nations in the WTO and World Bank towards developing nations and you have a very disturbing picture painted of many of the G20 nations acting in an imperialist nature as each seeks to carve out its own slice of the world.

The WTO aims to fit nations into a straightjacket of privatisation and deregulation which, in reality, will be dominated by corporate power and characterised by a loss of indigenous sovereignty and the “marginalisation and impoverishment of vulnerable sectors of populations”, as the nation-states involved move towards full compliance with the World Trade Organisation’s neo-liberal trade regime. (6)

The recently averted accession to the WTO by Tonga demonstrates the disastrous consequences that joining the WTO has for developing nations. Oxfam New Zealand, in its report, Blood from a Stone, exposed the reality of Tonga’s accession. Tonga will be allowed tariffs at no more than 20%, resulting in tariff cuts that are expected to “affect Tonga’s ability to provide basic health care, education, water supply and other essential services for its people.” (7)

“What can we do? We can re-invent civil disobedience in a million different ways. In other words, we can come up with a million ways of becoming a collective pain in the ass.” (Arundhati Roy)

Neo-liberalism must be stopped. Subcomandante Marcos of the Mexican Zapatista movement said: “what the Right offers is to turn the world into one big mall where they can buy Indians here, women there…”
police and protestors
The only way to a humane and fair world where global poverty really is history is to mobilise people, especially young people and students, to struggle for a better world and against the corporate agenda that will be promoted at the G20. Our, and everyone else’s, future is not for sale. We will join forces to resist the rule of the market, the cutting of social spending, deregulation, privatisation and the global push to make us forget about that thing called “community”. (8)

In December 2006, we will dance through the streets of Melbourne to oppose the G20 and the World Bank and IMF and the stooges of imperialism, like Paul Wolfowitz, that run them.

“Against the single economic blueprint where the market rules, we represent diverse, people-centred alternatives. Against the monoculture of global capital, we demand a world where many worlds fit…
Resisting together, our hope is reignited: hope because we have the power to reclaim memory from those who would impose oblivion, hope because we are more powerful than they can possibly imagine, hope because history is ours when we make it with our own hands.” (9)

References:
(1) Fifty Years is Enough, RESIST THE IMF & WORLD BANK! STOP CORPORATE GLOBALIZATION!
(2) Gabriel Kolko, AN ECONOMY OF BUCCANEERS AND FANTASISTS
(3) Oxfam’s Questions and Answers on Debt
(4) Drop the Debt by Barry Coates
(5) Global Exchange : World Bank / IMF Questions and Answers
(6) Professor Jane Kelsey, A People’s Guide to PACER, Commissioned by the Pacific Network on Globalisation, Suva, August, 2004.
(7) Oxfam International Briefing Note, Tonga: Blood from a Stone, December 15, 2005.
(8) Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo Garcà­a, What is “Neo-Liberalism”? A Brief Definition, February 26th, 2000.
(9) Notes from Nowhere, We are Everywhere, 2003, London.

LEARN MORE

Read Omar’s other article on the G20, and about why he plans to protest against the G20 in Melbourne, Get Up! Stand Up! Say No to the G20

Websites:
Global exchange
Focus on the Global South
Fifty Years is Enough
Oxfam New Zealand
Make Poverty History
ARENA

DVDs:
The Fourth World War!
The Take
(both available to borrow from the Just Focus library)

Books:
No Logo” by Naomi Klien
“Empty promises : the IMF, the Word Bank, and planned failures of global capitalism”

TAKE ACTION!

Banking with minutes

Monday, November 14th, 2005

Omar Hamedclock

A young minor offender being sentenced by his peers, an American insurance company being paid for in time, a peer tutoring system that rewards students with recycled computers and Glasgow residents paying for tarot card readings by doing gardening. Four very different applications of one simple idea. Time as currency.

Across 12 countries, over 500 Time Banks are working towards what many see as the “Third Economy”. From Ghana to Japan there are now community organisations structured not around money but around time. It’s not charity, it’s community; it does not value dollars, it values time. Time Banks trade hours of voluntary work, work done for the community and for individuals. It does not create an economy, it creates a society.

It works simply, you give up one hour of your time to voluntary work and you gain one time dollar. You can spend that tax free dollar on local services and other people’s time volunteered by other participating individuals and organisations. And it does not matter if you are a corporate lawyer doing community legal work or a sixteen year old tutoring your neighbour’s children, everyone’s hour is worth the same. A computer system calculates how many time dollars you have and sends you an account based on your earnings and spending.

In London you can spend that time dollar on drama classes or gaining IT skills. There are no longer recipients of charity or what the creator of this system, American Civil Rights Lawyer, Edgar Cahn, calls “the throw away people”.

Time Banks are based on four principles; Assets, that every human being is one, Redefining Work, no more taking women’s, children’s, or volunteers’ work for granted, Reciprocity, replacing one way acts with two way ones, and Social Capital, what British PM Tony Blair calls the “magic ingredient”, the work done that benefits the community and through ongoing investments of which we can turn social breakdown into social cohesion.

Surprisingly, Time Banks have been incredibly successful. In London alone there are 31 Time Banks that have clocked up over 28 000 hours in voluntary work. In Chicago refurbished computers were given out to 4800 students, in up to 50 problem schools, who did one hundred hours of peer tutoring and whose parents also did eight hours of community work. Academic results went up, bullying went down.

The crime ridden and notoriously poverty stricken housing development Benning Terrace in Washington DC now clocks up enough hours to buy four tons of food per month at the local food bank.

Law firm Holland and Knight billed the Shaw community in Washington for $230 000 in time dollars after they closed crack houses, made frozen government money available for a local playground, cleaned up local police corruption and kept the neighbourhood school open. The community repaid this by helping with the local clean up, school tutoring, a night escort service for elderly and by phoning in license plate numbers of drug dealers’ cars.

The benefit to the community does not end with the deed. With each payment and repayment bonds within the community strengthen and those people who have been told that they have no value; the unemployed, immigrants, the young and the elderly discover that they can in fact be an asset to the community. One participant of the scheme said it was “impossible not to make friends”.

In the UK, participation in Time Banks by those earning less than ’£10 000 is double that of the same demographic group participating in traditional volunteer work. Time Banks are redefining the responsible democratic citizen. A Californian law firm receives payment for legal advice by clients turning up to demonstrate outside the workplaces of bad employers.

Time as money schemes have the potential to revitalise the public sector by turning it from resource-stretched to resource-rich. With the expansion of the Time Bank scheme long waiting lists of mental health patients will be a thing of the past.

British doctors are already referring patients with long term depression to local Time Banks. What about New Zealand’s over stretched parole service and high rates of reoffending? In San Diego ex-prisoners pay for aftercare services in time dollars earned by being part of a support group.

In Washington D.C. volunteer youth jurors on a special Youth Court jury are paid in time dollars for their work. The youth offenders go before the court and are given community service sentences, Lifeskills training, they must make an apology to the victims and become a youth juror themselves.

The Youth Court is helping break down the cycle of reoffending which many justice systems encourage. In this way youth suddenly become responsible for participating in their community and finding alternatives to crime. One youth who was sentenced at the Youth Court later became a volunteer juror, helping other youth like himself.

What of Auckland’s growing traffic problem caused by low rates of public transport use? Plans have already been made in London for a “Tutor Commuter” program. You will be able to learn French on the Underground or teach English to new immigrants on the bus on your way to work.

In the 21st century Time Banks will have their day. Cahn’s goal, “To create a society where decency and caring are rewarded automatically” is becoming a reality in London, Washington and many other cities. How long before New Zealand joins this global movement? It is only a matter of time.

LEARN MORE

Time Dollar USA

Time Banks UK

Hunger, poverty and the real agenda of the IMF and world bank

Tuesday, October 18th, 2005

Cameron Walker

Created out of the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944 the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) claim to have the noble aims of helping third world nations to finance the building of infrastructure and to bridge balance of payments difficulties. However, many claim both institutions help ruin the economies of Third World nations through forced structural adjustment programmes, which are a condition to any loans or aid from them. Many also claim that the policies of both institutions directly benefit powerful multi-national corporations.

IMF logoThe draconian terms of the structural adjustment programmes often include the elimination of tariffs on imports, the forced privatisation of state owned assets, the removal of subsidies to local producers, the reduction of crop diversity and the forced export of crops to a small number of foreign buyers. These policies often lead to much poverty and injustice.

In 1999 the Bolivian city of Cochabamba privatised its public water supply under the intense pressure of the World Bank. The citizens of Cochabamba then as a result faced water bill price hikes of $20 a month. In a nation where the minimum wage is under $100 a month this was absolutely disastrous. What is even more shocking is that after privatisation the citizens of Cochabamba ended up paying more a month for water than people who live in the wealthiest suburbs of Washington D.C.

The policies of the World Bank and IMF are largely blamed for causing Malawi’s 2002 famine. The strings which were attached to an IMF loan package to Malawi included the privatisation of the Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation, removal of agricultural subsidies to small farmers and the deregulation of price controls on staple foods such as maize. Between October 2001 and March 2002 the price of maize increased by 400 percent as a result of these policies. In 2002 Malawi spent 20 percent of its national budget on debt repayment to Western creditors. This is more than Malawi spent on health, education and agriculture combined.

The foreign debt of many Third World nations will literally take hundreds of years to pay off. Indonesia’s foreign debt for example is $262 billion. This is 170 percent of Indonesia’s gross domestic product. Every day poor nations pay $100 million to Western creditors in debt repayment, mainly to institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank. Since the 1980’s the policies of these institutions have led to developing nations paying out five times as much capital to rich industrialised nations as they have received in aid.

Decisions at the World Bank and the IMF are made by a vote of the board of executive directors, which represent member states. The voting process does not reflect proper democracy because voting power is determined by the amount a member state contributes to the institutions. This means the U.S.A has roughly 17 percent of the vote and has a dominant voice on policy and at times has exercised the power of veto. The World’s seven largest industrialised nations have 45 percent of the vote at the World Bank and IMF. As a result of this the policies of the World Bank and IMF often directly benefit industries based in Western industrialised nations. The company which bought Cochabamba’s water supply after it was privatised was Aguas del Tunari, part of International Water Limited, a British based company half owned by the American engineering giant, Bechtel. U.S. treasury officials have estimated that for every $1 the United States contributes to International development banks, U.S. exporters win more than U.S. $2 in bank financed procurement contracts.

It would seem to be common sense for poor nations to be encouraged to be self sufficient in food production; common sense seems to be contrary to World Bank and IMF policy. Some poor nations have had to endure having their crop diversity limited and then being forced to export the few crops produced to Western Nations. In the early 1990’s the famous investigative journalist John Pilger pointed out that forty percent of arable land in Senegal is used for growing peanuts for Western margarine and in Ghana fifty percent of arable land is used for growing cocoa for export to make Western chocolate bars. Both of these nations suffer malnutrition yet export most of their crops; a scene reminiscent of Ireland under British Imperialism during the potato famine of the 1840’s.

It is easy to come to the conclusion that the World Bank and IMF’s true agenda is very different than the one they sell to the public. They claim to help poor nations but really aid multinational corporations at the expense of Third World nations. These two institutions need to be greatly reformed to be any use in helping tackle one of the greatest problems of the early 21st Century, poverty.

References

Burgo, Ezequiel and Stewart, Heather ( 29/10/2002) The Guardian

Pilger, John (1994) Distant Voices London: Vintage

Pilger, John (2002) The New Rulers Of The World London: Verso

LEARN MORE

World Bank/IMF Factsheet

A global system gone mad

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

Cameron Walker

Globalisation’, free trade’, neo-liberalism’ (call it what you will - the economic policies supported by global institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank ) have been protested about and opposed by tens of millions of people around the globe. Why are so many people so angry? In the Western World, before 9/11, coverage of violent anti-globalisation protests’ often splattered the news in the mainstream media. 9/11, according to the mainstreammedia signalled the death of the movement. However, such feelings have not died and, in fact, in many developing nations they have become more intense.

The historical background of the World Bank and IMF
The World Bank and IMF were set up at the end of the Second World War to provide loans to help rebuild nations shattered by the conflict. In the 1970s and 1980s the two institutions had a change of policy. Nations who wanted loans or financial assistance would have to follow structural adjustment programs. In other words developing nations would have to make changes to their laws and economic policies as prescribed by the World Bank and IMF.

The effects of Structural Adjustment Programs
Often structural adjustment programmes make conditions even worse for the poorest citizens of developing nations, while the well off and multinational corporations reap the rewards. Typically, structural adjustment programs consist of slashing public education and healthcare spending, cutting welfare to the poor, opening markets to penetration by multinational corporations and privatising public assets, such as water utilities and railways.

An example of Structural Adjustment Programs’ negative impacts: Bolivia.
A classic example of structural adjustment occurred in 1999 in Bolivia, the poorest nation in South America. The city of Cochabamba was pressured to privatise its public water company by the World Bank. It was sold to Aguas del Tunari, part of International Water Limited, a British based company part owned by the American engineering giant Bechtel and the Spanish company Abengoa.

Within weeks of taking over the city’s public water company Bechtel hiked up rates by as much as 200%, far beyond what the city’s poor could afford to pay.’ (1)

Many poor families now paid higher water bills than those paid by residents of the wealthy suburbs of Washington DC, home to many World Bank officials.

To further compound the problems of the poor, the government banned collecting rain water without a permit. For many families it was a choice between spending money on food to eat, or having water to drink. This spurred a huge peoples’ movement to return water to public hands. After unprecedented street protests, in which police fired on the crowds killing a 17 year old boy and wounding scores of others, the city returned water to public ownership.

However, the story did not end there. Bechtel, citing unfair loss of profits, launched a US $25 million (New Zealand $35.4 million) lawsuit against Bolivia. Thankfully, after bearing the brunt of an international campaign, Bechtel dropped the lawsuit in December 2004. Unfortunately, the Spanish company Abengoa is still pursuing legal action against Bolivia, despite international calls for it to drop it.

G8 Debt Relief - with strings attached

In June 2005, the nations of the G8 declared that the most highly indebted nations in the World will have their debts to the World Bank and IMF cleared. This sounds nice, but to qualify for debt relief poor nations must practice good governance’ meaning the nations must “boost private-sector development” and eliminate “impediments to private investment, both domestic and foreign”. Quite simply this means that to qualify for debt relief, poor nations must continue to put in place Structural Adjustment Programmes (like those forced on Bolivia) which are fundamentally damaging to their nation’s citizens, but good for multinational corporations from the World’s richest nations in the G8.

Speak out against the injustice
As a young activist and writer in New Zealand, I believe it is important for young people to become informed and speak out against the grave injustices that are occurring as a result of the so called globalisation’ process. The New Zealand government is an enthusiastic supporter, at an international level, of the so called free market’ policies supported by the World Bank and IMF. As the citizens of Bolivia have demonstrated though, people power can overcome this madness!

Reference:
1) Shultz Jim The Second Water War in Bolivia

LEARN MORE

The Democracy Center, The Democracy Center works globally to advance human rights through a unique combination of investigation and reporting, training citizens in the art of public advocacy, and organizing international citizen campaigns, it’s founder and Executive Director Jim Shultz lives in Cochabamba and was fundamental in breaking the story of the city’s water war to the outside World

TAKE ACTION!

Read some alternative news!
Zmag has many independent articles on Globalisation

Globalisation — what are the negative impacts?

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

Andrew Colgan

What is Globalisation?
Globalisation is the buzz word on everybody’s lips in the 21st century. But what does it mean? It basically means the world is getting smaller in just about every sense, except for geographically. Exchange is becoming more rapid, travel more feasible, communication faster and more accessible, advertising and media more widespread and movement of money more free-flowing.

Globalisation’s winners and losers
But globalisation is causing huge problems. Those who appear to be in control of the process (transnational corporations (TNCs), multilateral institutions and governments of wealthy industrialised nations) don’t seem to have the interests of everybody in mind. Consequently, economic and financial globalisation is happening at a rate disproportionate to all other developments. Economists and world leaders speak in terms of revenue, exchange, capital movement, structural adjustment and interest. Such concepts as emotion, cultural identity equality, environmental protection and social benefit seem to be foreign and are left out of the equation.

Some problems caused by Globalisation

The resulting problems are huge, and hit women, children and those on the periphery (especially in poorer countries) the hardest. These problems include:

  • Exploitation in employment — as well as appalling wages and working conditions, in many cases women and children are abducted and forced to work in oppressive factories or as sex workers.
  • The rise of the HIV / AIDS pandemic, displacement and longer working hours resulting in the orphaning and abandonment of children.
  • Neglect of the sick, illiterate, disabled and elderly as governments’ priorities shift towards economic growth and servicing of public debt.

The role of International institutions
The fate of many poorer or “developing” nations lies in the hands of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Claims that Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) are in the best interest of those poorer nations, and not simply for the benefit of the wealthy creditors of these International Financial Institutions (IFIs), are dubious at best. The liberalisation of trade by the WTO has meant a removal of tariffs. Now only governments which can afford to pay subsidies can protect their producers. The complexity of international trade often makes it difficult to understand how huge disparities come about. Some excellent examples are given in a Christian Aid video called “Nuts”.

The problems with Transnational Corporations
Transnational corporations (TNCs) are quietly gaining dangerously unaccountable political power in both rich and poor countries. For example:

  • Finland is home of the mobile phone company Nokia. This company is so big that it accounts for 2/3 of the stock exchange, 1/5 of all exports, a significant proportion of the country’s tax revenue and employs over 22,00 Finns. By threatening to remove production to another country, Nokia effectively holds the Finnish government to ransom and so has a great influence in its political decision making.
  • Wal-mart is a huge American department store. Its clothing range is produced in factories in Bangladesh, taking advantage of the fact that there are no minimum wage laws there. Wal-mart is 55 times the size of the entire Bangladesh economy. By threatening to remove production to another impoverished (and therefore cheap) country, it has negotiated a deal with the government so it no longer pays a single cent of taxes.

The widening gap between the rich and poor
Despite extensive plundering of the world’s natural resources, this wealth has been shared less and less equally and extreme poverty remains. The gap between rich and poor is growing on a local and an international level:

  • The richest 20% of the world’s population enjoy 86% of its resources while the poorest 20% must survive with a little over 1%.
  • The 225 richest people in the world have the equivalent income to the poorest 2.25 billion.
  • The world’s 3 richest people have fortunes equivalent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the world’s poorest 36 countries.
  • 200 million children never start school (3/4 of these are girls). The amount needed to send these children to school each year is less than the amount spent on cosmetics in the USA and less than half the amount spent on ice-cream in Europe.


The Homogenisation of a Global Youth Culture

The growth of advertising and the entertainment media is contributing to the rising of a homogenous global youth culture. In New Zealand it is now estimated that we see on average over 3000 advertisements every day. Young people are made to feel insecure through “image advertising” and then told consumption is the answer to their insecurities. The result is a rise in individualism and a lack of compassion and care for others. People are encouraged to care more about money and image than family and community. Perhaps this plays a part in the high youth suicide rate in New Zealand. The other adverse effect of this global youth culture is that we are seeing people all around lose their unique cultural identities in pursuit of a branded western culture. In many ways, diversity is fighting a losing battle against globalisation.

LEARN MORE

Try googling any of these subjects and you’ll find heaps of articles and discussion — but here’s a selection to start you off…

Sweatshops
Corporation Watch — exposing sweatshops
Article in A World Connected
The feminist perspective

Child labour
Human Rights Watch
UNICEF

Trafficking
Human Rights Watch
United Nations

HIV and AIDS — stats, info, aid agencies etc
Young People and AIDS
UN Report (June 2005) on the impact on young people

International Financial Institutions (IFIs)

Watching the IFIs
US Network for Economic Justice

Debt
Jubilee Debt Campaign
Article in Global Issues on Debt

Corporations
Corporation Watch — holding corporations accountable
Corporate Watch

TAKE ACTION!

  • Read an article on this by the same author, Andrew Colgan : Youth Response to Globalisation

Why are we living in a state of Global Injustice?

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

Geoff Cooper

Ever get the feeling that the more you find out about your world, the less you wish you knew? Is it simply that the human race is incompetent at managing the planet and people? Or perhaps that our attempts at global euphoria have just gone badly astray?

Injustices have existed since the beginning of time, and this is often used to justify a certain level of it in our modern world. But just how much are we willing to accept?

  • 1.2 billion people live without access to safe drinking water while the 3 richest people in the world earn the equivalent of the combined Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the 37 poorest countries
  • every 10 seconds someone in the world dies from HIV/AIDS
  • it is estimated that around 300,000 children around the world are exploited as child soldiers

The figures are endless, and after a while it is easy to become immune to their impact. But before we agree to put these down to inevitability, lets look at where we spend our resources that could overcome such problems:

  • the U.S spends $8bn/year on cosmetics
  • basic education for all children would cost $6bn/year
  • the cost of eradicating poverty is 1% of global income
  • Europeans spend $11bn/year on ice cream
  • while clean water and safe sewers for all would cost $9bn/year

With statistics such as these we can logically prove that these problems are very much a human construction. To believe that they are an inevitable part of society represents a lack of understanding of the ideology behind such phenomena.

The Ideological and Institutional Bases of Global Injustice
When we trace the causes of poverty, it is not uncommon to end up on the doorsteps of the institutions that make the rules of international trade - in particular the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It seems whenever leaders of these institutions meet, there are mass protests. Seattle, Washington, Prague, Geneva are just a few examples of the protests that have arisen over the past 20 years at such conferences. There is a common belief that these organisations are to blame for much of the poverty we see in developing countries It is one of the great ironies of world institutions that the World Bank actually claims to be alleviating mass poverty (check out what the World Bank claims it does.).

So what is it that these institutions are doing wrong? With the best academic scholars the world has to offer at their side it is hard to imagine that they are incompetent at their job. Rather, we must recognise what fundamental rationale exists behind the array of questionable decisions that they continue to put into global effect.

What these institutions honestly believe is that what is good for business and large corporations will be good for everybody… eventually. Extending this rationale, it becomes clear that when the rules of trade are written, they should be written in the interests of these corporations. If the conditions are good enough for these corporations, we will eventually all reap the benefits. If discrepancies exist between reality and what the Neoliberal institutions claim to be working towards (essentially a stable society), their excuse is simply that more time is needed for the copious benefits to be actually realised. But just how long must we wait before we can formally conclude that this system will never work in consideration of the world’s poor?

LEARN MORE

American Christian Organisation seeking justice for the world’s hungry people BREAD
Guide to Free Trade history, theory and ideology
Neoliberalism explained
The Impact of the WTO

TAKE ACTION!

Make Poverty History
Bono’s organisation (lead singer of U2)
NZ initiative by World Vision to get involved in